|
Partner Meetings -
Meeting Notes
AAM DIRECTORS MEETING
September 30 - October 2, 2004
Washington, DC
Present
Present at the meetings were national
AAM staff members Chris Dennen, Karin Hedberg, Oran Mosteller,
and Ove Andersen; ERC Executive Director John Hunter;
LOC staff members Elizabeth Ridgway and Janet Starkweather;
AAM directors Sandi Estep, Pat Pecoy, Nelly Hecker, Margo
Tomaras, Marita Decker, Bob Pettis, Rhonda Clevenson,
Mark Newman,
Ed Shearin, Jerry Hostetler, Joy Rogers, Jodi Huggins,
Wendy Fusco, Michael Brna, Barbara Kirby, Rick Satchwell,
Cindy Rich, Pam Johnson, Bob Ervin, and Peggy O’Neill-Jones;
and AAM partner staff members Byron Holdiman, Amy Martin,
Symantha Petitt, Binod Pokhrel, and Samantha Cofield.
AAM directors Amy Wilkinson and Beth
Coulter were unable to attend.
September 30 Library of Congress Orientation
About 12 AAM directors and staff who
were visiting the Library of Congress (LOC) for the first
time attended an all-day orientation organized by Elizabeth
Ridgway, Educational Outreach Team Leader. Ms. Ridgway
led participants on a tour of the LOC Web site and the
Learning Page. Jan Grenci, Reference Specialist, Prints
and Photographs Division, spoke about the selection, cataloguing,
and digitizing of primary sources documents. Mike Hughes
of the Office of the General Counsel addressed copyright
issues of particular interest to educators. The group also
toured the Jefferson Building, the oldest and most architecturally
stunning of the LOC's three main downtown facilities.
October 1 Professional Development Activity
All attendees participated in a two-part
professional development activity. First, the group was
guided through
the Brown vs. Board of Education exhibit by Daun van
Ee, one of the curators of the exhibit. Next, Susan Mordan
and Gail Petri led attendees through a new political
cartoon activity, "It's No Laughing Matter," from
the LOC's Learning Page, that can be used effectively
in the classroom. The activity, based on political cartoons
from the Brown vs. Board of Education exhibit, allows
students to analyze cartoonists' persuasive techniques.
October 2 Directors Meeting
Welcome and Introductions
Barbara Kirby, facilitator and member of the Directors
Meeting Planning Committee, welcomed the group. She announced
two new members of the committee: Sandi Estep and Joy
Rogers. She also thanked Mark Newman and Beth Coulter
for their service on the committee. Mark and Beth are
rotating off at the conclusion of this meeting.
National AAM Program Update
Chris Dennen, National AAM Program Director, addressed
the group. He recognized two individuals who do not often
receive recognition for their contributions to the AAM
program: LOC Grant Administrator George Daves and ERC
Executive Director John Hunter. He also recognized Elizabeth
Ridgway for her tireless work on behalf of the program.
The AAM video conferencing initiative
continues to grow and is becoming very successful.
To-date, 42 LOC video
conferences have been held specifically for the AAM program,
with 540 teacher participants. With more AAM partners
incorporating this feature in their workshops, AAM expects
this number to reach 100 broadcasts in the very near
future. The strategy has been to use video conferencing
broadcasts in two ways: 1) to introduce the program in
schools and encourage first-time participation; and 2)
as an integrated part of an existing workshop series.
Oran Mosteller has recently been named AAM’s Video
Conferencing Coordinator.
The AAM Web site continues to expand and now contains
all the basic AAM program information. The next phase
of its growth will focus on program refinements. The
site now has 600 unique visitors weekly, with an average
of 11,000 weekly hits. At the end of 2004, the projected
cumulative number of unique visitors will be 20,000.
A survey conducted by AAM national staff last spring
indicated mostly positive reaction from AAM directors
and staff, especially in the area of content and content
organization. Staff intend to follow up on other feedback
received in the survey, and Dr. Dennen encouraged additional
comment from users.
All home school lessons now have an interactive start
features. Twelve new NC lessons will be online later
this month. There have been some delays due to significant
technical challenges and other unforeseen obstacles.
The next plan is to create an online version of these
lessons for use by regular classroom students as assigned
by their teachers. (This will be completely separate
from the home school lessons and the Home School Program
Web site.) This new section will be launched and tested
this fall.
The AAM lesson plan database now contains 59 lessons,
with 51 more now in the vetting process. The process
of putting a single lesson online, after vetting, takes
about three to four hours per lesson. It is expected
that more than 100 lessons will be online by the next
meeting. A separate learning experiences database for
the products of Phase II is being developed by the Ad
Hoc Lesson Plan Committee. Joy Rogers, chair of this
committee, will make a report later in the meeting.
Dr. Dennen summarized the UNCA Computer Literacy program
for at-risk middle school youth. This program has been
running for four years at the University of North Carolina-Asheville.
A complete summary of that project to-date will be posted
online soon.
The Telephone Support Line (a.k.a.
"Hotline")
has recently been closed due to low usage. Dr. Dennen
recognized that this was directly due to the valuable
and consistent support provided to teachers by each AAM
partner, thereby rendering the Hotline unnecessary to
the program.
Dr. Dennen announced the release of an exhibit kit for
AAM partners. AAM staff have developed a kit of graphic
files that may be used to create banners, posters, and
handouts for use at conferences, presentations, information
booths/tables, and poster sessions. The kit components
will be available on the AAM Web site very soon.
There are two books in production
on AAM topics. The first is the history being written
by Jim Brown, a professor
at Mars Hill College, covering the first four years of
the project in general and Phase I in particular. The
book is in its final stages of production, but has been
greatly delayed. The second book is being spearheaded
by Joy Rogers and will focus on the AAM program's
approach to using primary resources. Several directors
are contributing sections. No AAM funds are being used
for this project.
At the end of the last EDC evaluation, a number of recommendations
were made, many of which are already being addressed
in various aspects of the program. Dr. Dennen is working
on a response for the four remaining items that need
to be addressed. This report will be revealed to the
group following review and approval by the LOC and ERC.
Once the AAM response has been approved, the Executive
Committee will be asked to develop an action plan. The
four points are:
Library and Media Specialists
We should start recording our collective experiences
in teaching Librarians and media specialists. These
professionals play an important role in consulting
with, and guiding, classroom teachers and their students.
If appropriate, we should develop and publish specific
strategies, curricula, and materials for this group.
Formal Alumni Program
We have done well supporting, and benefiting from the
support, of our alumni at the partner level. The next
step is to create a national alumni program.
Pathfinders
One tool that seems to be useful for our teachers is
a list of LOC primary source materials that is especially
well suited for supporting specific topics at each
grade level. The challenge is to create lists that
are specific enough to be useful and general enough
to be used across the States, and will not need constant
updating.
Learning Experiences Database
We need to form the evaluation committee so that the
directors can begin to submit materials.
LOC Updates
Elizabeth Ridgway provided an
update on LOC online activities. An electronic "library
card" has
been developed by the LOC and Ms. Ridgway distributed
a sample to each
participant. This is a CD with an intro and overview
to the LOC. She also distributed two handouts, one showing
collections that are organized by subject matter, and
one to track use of digitized resources.
Ms. Ridgway demonstrated the version 1.5 redesign of
the American Memory Web site, which will go live in a
few weeks. The majority of changes are in organization
and page layout. A global navigation feature is being
added. The issue of book marking specific items is not
being addressed is this phase, but will be implemented
gradually. This change will require a significant period
of time.
Several collections have been converted to the 1.5 style.
All new collections will be displayed in this format.
Older collections will be converted based on a priority
system.
Partner Presentations
Rhonda Clevenson, from the Northern
Virginia Schools Partnership, demonstrated an activity
on "Presidents." Each
participant was given a colored folder with an image
of a photo or print (letter, manuscript, etc.). Participants
gathered into groups according to the president their
folder represented. Groups were asked to contemplate
questions, such as: what skills does a president need
to be an effective leader? Groups then reassembled according
to the color of their folders and discussed the common
theme represented by their folders. Dr. Clevenson discussed
ways in which this activity could be adapted to classroom
use.
Bob Pettis of USC Upstate (South Carolina)
demonstrated a quick and easy way for teachers to track
citations
for
their
primary
resources and collections.
Peggy O'Neill-Jones of Metro
State College of Denver (Colorado) provided an overview
of her workshop series. Her program uses
a rich media approach
demonstrated with three different lesson plan prototypes.
Ms. Jones showed how rich media can be used, and also
the differences between "regular" media and
rich media.
EDC Evaluation Report
Lauren Goldenberg and Bill Tally from the EDC presented.
They have been tasked by the ERC to produce a new evaluation
report on Phase II of the AAM program. A draft framework
is now being developed. The process will end in December
2005 with the release of a new report. EDC has been involved
in evaluating American Memory programs since 1995, including
the American Memory Fellows Program.
Ms. Goldenberg said several interviews have been conducted
with AAM directors. She addressed program goals that
directors named and how they rated their importance.
AAM partners are collecting data in very different ways,
such as through questionnaires for teachers and school
districts. EDC is recommending that directors consider
using standardized feedback tools.
The first phase of the evaluation will involve building
a database of educators and other AAM program enrollees.
A meaningful unit of instruction must be defined (i.e.,
how many contact hours constitutes a unit of instruction?).
General data and feedback collection will be accompanied
by periodic in-depth case studies. Data collection will
include the basic statistics that AAM directors are collecting,
such as number of enrollees, number and type of workshops,
etc.
Three local evaluation strategies
are being recommended: 1) Process measures to discover
how participants respond
to workshops, 2) performance measures to gauge teacher
knowledge in key areas matched to program goals, and
3) descriptive measures to capture rich portraits of
AAM partner activities and their results. Directors will
be given "toolboxes" of evaluation strategies
and instruments that can be selected for various applications
specific to individual AAM programs. Mr. Tally demonstrated
some possible evaluation tools from the toolbox, using
both online and paper instruments.
Mr. Tally and Ms. Goldenberg took questions from the
group. Many future opportunities for feedback will be
made available, including the formation of an advisory
group comprised of directors. There was considerable
discussion about the general plan and its goals. Several
directors had questions about the framework and offered
suggestions for aspects to consider in the design. When
providing feedback, Dr. Dennen urged everyone (partners,
ERC, LOC) to think in terms of their own needs only,
and not those of the entire group (i.e., each entity
or institution should define what they are seeking in
this process for their own goals and purposes only).
Learning Experiences Database
Joy Rogers reported on the work of her ad hoc committee.
She distributed a matrix that illustrated the proposed
framework for this database and asked for comment from
the group. The initial lessons that will be accepted
will be determined by consensus of the committee. An
evaluation process will be developed by the committee
to determine how new material will be accepted and by
what criteria in order to keep the database limited to
150 plans (three per category). There was discussion
on whether plans that are accepted into the database
should be reformatted into a standard AAM-determined
format for increased usability. Dr. Dennen asked the
Executive Committee to review this report and recommend
the next action step for this process, such as the possible
formation of standing committee.
Primary Source Lesson Examples
Barbara Kirby, Ann Canning, and
Amy Martin from Waynesburg College (Pennsylvania) presented
a map activity showing
historic and contemporary panoramic (a.k.a., bird's
eye view) maps of Washington, DC. An activity like this
can be used to illustrate, discuss, and understand change
in a city. To do this activity in their workshops, the
staff have converted LOC maps to iMap format. Waynesburg
has a special arrangement with the R. J. Lee Group to
use this program (which is still in beta format) and
distribute it to their workshop participants. They have
used this technique with panoramic photos. This approach
allows in-depth analysis of material. MrSID software
is less dynamic than the iMap.
Wendy Fusco from Montreat College (North Carolina) demonstrated
how she models photo analysis activities with her teachers.
This has been a very successful component of her Phase
II program because teachers can take away with them a
very simple but powerful classroom activity and apply
it immediately.
Ed Shearin from Mars Hill College (North Carolina) presented
an overview of his digital storytelling workshop series.
Due to regular post-workshop program evaluation by the
Mars Hill AAM team, the curriculum for Level 1 is now
in its sixth revision. Using digital cameras, teachers
are shown the basics of photography to begin the process
of learning good digital storytelling techniques. Dr.
Shearin showed some examples of digital stories created
by teachers.
Ad Hoc LiveText Committee Report
Peggy O'Neill-Jones, committee
chair, reported. LiveText (www.livetext.com) is a developer
of standard-led,
online educational services tailored to the particular
needs and challenges of educators. The program is available
to teachers and teacher candidates as a paid subscriber
service, but is free to college faculty. The committee
is exploring potential use of this service by AAM and
as a place to house AAM teacher products. Ms. Jones demonstrated
some ways this could be achieved. LiveText has offered
to create a specific AAM domain and will give each AAM
participant a free one-year subscription.
Using LiveText would likely require the development
of a standard AAM lesson plan template that all AAM participants
could use. Lesson plans can be matched to state standards
and are all organized by subject, grade level, and topic.
There was discussion at-length about the pros and cons
of LiveText, based on the experiences of several directors
(fees, technical issues, etc.). Participants also debated
the need for another Web site to supplement those of
the national AAM program and partner programs that already
contain teacher products. Ms. Jones will conduct some
follow-up activity with LiveText to see whether a test
AAM site can be created and demonstrated. Dr. Dennen
also asked the committee to continue its exploratory
work.
Next Meeting
The next directors meeting is
scheduled for April 14-15, 2005, in Washington, DC.
Directors are asked to contact
any member of the Directors Meeting Planning Committee
with ideas for that meeting's agenda.
is made available through a grant funded by the U.S. Congress.
AAM is administered through
the .
For site-related problems, e-mail aam@ercwc.org..
 |