|
Faculty Development Programs
Return to Faculty Development main page
Report of the Federation of Independent Illinois Colleges
and Universities
Adventure of the American Mind Fall Conference - November
2003
Prepared by Lisa Tolbert
“…workshops are too often mind-numbing feel-good
sessions conceived by administrators that aim at boosting
campus morale.” – participating faculty
member
The challenge to create a viable model of instruction for
higher education faculty to incorporate the use of digitized
primary sources available at the Library of Congress American
Memory web site was accepted with an overwhelming clamor
of interest and enthusiasm at the November 7th and 8th, 2003
fall conference. A diverse group of well-credentialed representatives
from the Federation of Independent Illinois Colleges and
Universities in collaboration with National Louis University,
Bradley University, Dominican University, Greenville College,
and McKendree College came together to devise a faculty development
process to educate colleagues on using the American Memory
web site in their courses.
The objectives of this initial conference were to orient
faculty representatives to each other as well as the project,
including the American Memory, Library of Congress, and the
Adventure of the American Mind web sites. There was also
a need to identify the areas of expertise of participating
faculty members and to assess their strengths and weaknesses
in the fields of technology integration, primary sources
and content knowledge, and course development. A third concern
was to develop strategies to encourage a long-term commitment
to the AAM project in higher education faculty. In addition,
project guidelines and a project schedule were developed.
Lastly, the parameters of the web site design and use were
established to incorporate the site as a means of communication
as well as a method for the exchange of ideas. In all these
areas, consensus decision-making helped build community and
ownership of the project.
Though all of the initial objectives were met at this conference,
as anticipated, there were differing opinions regarding the
methods of approaching faculty development. Each institution
has its own unique approach when it comes to faculty educational
programs. As a result, many questions remain. What are the
forces that generate change within the faculty community
and how they can be harnessed for this project? Are there
any common characteristics that can be identified among all
the participating institutions in their proposed course of
learning that can be considered in structuring a method to
implement programs on a grand scale?
There is no question that there is a growing demand for
the professional development of all faculty members to meet
the advancement of instructional and classroom technology.
However, due to the differing ability levels in technological
competence, what are the implications of technology background
knowledge deficiencies? What additional considerations are
needed to address those individuals who have a hesitance
toward technological proficiency? Moreover, is it appropriate
to distinguish unique categories of the higher level faculty
population? New faculty, mid-career faculty and senior faculty
members have differing professional objectives and will be
more receptive to differing developmental programs. Are there
any commonalities in terms of continuing educational needs?
Reflecting current trends in faculty
development, the conference stressed the idea of “ownership”.
Participants observed that programs should never be foisted
upon faculty
and that faculty must be involved significantly in all levels
of development. They must perceive a need to change before
they will commit themselves to participating in a faculty
development area. Faculty members must feel empowered and
see the program as a viable asset in their teaching curriculum.
The issue for most faculty is not resistance to change or
lack of understanding of the necessity for change, but the
format and execution of the faculty development requirement.
The conference reflected these ideas by adopting a colloquium
format that facilitated building community and instilling
ownership around participation. It set the stage for the
next project phase; developing draft proposals for faculty
development at each institution.
is made available through a grant funded by the U.S. Congress.
AAM is administered through
the .
For site-related problems, e-mail aam@ercwc.org..

|